» Resources » Collaborating for Sustainability: a Case Study Blog Collaborating for Sustainability: a Case Study Dear Reader – I am guilty of recycling my own content. This one is from a LinkedIn post I wrote three years ago, but still very much relevant today, and you will see why later in this article. “It takes two flints to make a fire.” – Louisa May Alcott This is a case study I presented at the Institute for Collaborative Working (ICW) course in March 2019. All delegates had to make an individual presentation on how we had applied the principles of collaboration to achieve an outcome. I recognise that I was only thinking about sustainability outcomes at the time. But it was a pleasant surprise that I ended up with a collaborative relationship with Camden Council. Why does this case study come to mind? In my current consultancy day job, I work with a lot of local authorities who are trying to get the ‘best/added value for money’ from their supply chain whilst also trying to mitigate the harsh impacts of modern slavery, carbon emissions and plastic waste. Their understanding of added value or value for money, however, is usually money saved on budget rather than cost avoidance or mitigation. When dealing with one such client, I heard the typical comment about ‘lack of time and resources.’ As a procurement professional, I completely understand this. Procurement teams often are understaffed due to a failure to recognise the crucial role this service department plays within an organisation. But what my client said shocked me: ‘Collaboration is a fancy term, why do I need to do it? I tell the supplier my requirements, they should supply what I need and do it now.’ Let us stop here for a moment, close our mouths from hanging open at that comment, and explore a positive case study about sustainability and collaboration. A case study on collaborating for sustainability On the HS2 Enabling Works Contract (EWC), the head contract Works Information suggested as an example (not stipulated) that we engage with the local boroughs affected by the project work to ensure community engagement and investment. There were also targets around the percentage of SMEs in the supply chain. We saw this as an opportunity to engage early on with our local borough, Camden, to encourage local businesses and SMEs. Sound simple? Well, it was. And this is because both sides had a common goal and the right behaviours to collaborate, and managed to pull together all their resources and support to make it happen. It was a meeting at our offices – the JV office working on the enabling works of HS2 with the economic development officers at Camden. The proposal was simple: to work together to encourage local and SME suppliers and subcontractors in our supply chain for this project. After deciding on the goal, all that was needed to do was make it work. Process & outcome We started by identifying tenders suitable for SMEs, any contractual dispensations we could offer them, any potential training needs, and ways we could simplify our ITT pack. Then, together with Camden borough and CompeteFor, we advertised a workshop event for the SMEs and local supply chain. We invited suppliers from Camden to participate in an interactive session wherein we helped them fill out dummy tenders to break down the barriers to SMEs and diverse businesses being able to tender for works on large infrastructure projects. The outcome of this meant that we targeted the right supply chain for our works and had almost 52% SMEs, local and diverse suppliers on our projects. The relationship between the EWC and Camden borough is one of the purest forms of collaboration as we did not have a contract between us. We were not obligated to collaborate to make anything happen. But we came together with a common objective, we said what we would do, and we did it. Having the right people in the room – people who displayed openness, trust, and willingness to share information – made this possible. Moreover, we beat the client’s targets of having a diverse supply chain on board. I am passionate about sustainability and collaboration and will continue to see them collide positively in my job. Would you like to learn more about how collaboration can benefit your sustainability strategy and your procurement process to generate social value? Reach out to our Lead Sustainable Procurement Consultant – Mellita D’Silva. Mellita D’Silva Sustainable Procurement Consultant mellita@actionsustainability.com Aug 2, 2022 Share: Related Articles April 2025 Blog Getting Started with Social Value: What It Is and Why It Matters Sam Walker April 2025 Blog Getting Started with Social Value: What It Is and Why It Matters In recent years, Social Value has emerged as a significant element within the framework of sustainable development, particularly in the context of public procurement. But whilst some organisations may be confident in their understanding and delivery of Social Value, many organisations – in particular SMEs – are being introduced to the concept for the first […] Keagan Allin April 2025 Modern Slavery & Human Rights The EU’s Omnibus Package: What’s Changing in CSRD and CSDDD Action Sustainability Staff April 2025 Modern Slavery & Human Rights The EU’s Omnibus Package: What’s Changing in CSRD and CSDDD In 2021 and 2022, the European Union introduced two groundbreaking sustainability laws: the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Now, more than three years later and with implementation just around the corner, the European Commission has put forward an ‘Omnibus Simplification Package’. This new proposal aims to ease […] Keagan Allin March 2025 CO₂ Performance Ladder Comparing the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) with the CO2 Performance Ladder Action Sustainability Staff March 2025 CO₂ Performance Ladder Comparing the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) with the CO2 Performance Ladder The Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and the CO2 Performance Ladder (the Ladder) are two powerful tools for organisations aiming to address climate change and reduce carbon emissions. While both share common goals, they differ in approach, scope, and application. This article provides a comprehensive comparison to help organisations understand their similarities, differences, and potential complementarities. […] Keagan Allin