» Resources » What are the three pillars of sustainability? Blog What are the three pillars of sustainability? The concept of the ‘three pillars’ of sustainability became widely recognised within the early 2000s, particularly following the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development. The three pillars of sustainability consist of: • Environment• Social• Economic The Environmental Pillar of sustainability relates to physical aspects of the world we live in, including the air we breathe, water, and the resources we consume. It also includes issues such as biodiversity and the protection of flora and fauna. The Social Pillar of sustainability relates to the more human elements of sustainability. From a built environment perspective, this includes key issues ranging from building strong positive relationships with the communities we work in, to ensuring skills in the construction sector are developed and workers are treated fairly. The Economic Pillar of sustainability relates to some of the more financial aspects of sustainability. This can range from the running costs of a piece of equipment compared to purchase, through to the financial value we place on some of the services the natural environment provides us. It can also include wider benefits such as job creation and local spend. Considering environmental and economic issues may lead to situations that are ‘Viable’. However, this might be to the detriment of social issues. For example, a developer might construct a new housing development using all of the latest environmental technology to construct super-efficient properties with a minimal impact on the environment. They may also be very aware of their target market. However, they might also fail to consider social issues such as engaging and listening to local people about their views on the development, or even ensuring some homes are made affordable so existing communities can be maintained. Considering environmental and social issues may lead to situations that are ‘Bearable’. However, this might be to the detriment of economic issues. For example, a community could set up a project to afforest an area of wasteland in their town. This could lead to a number of benefits such as improved habitat for wildlife and bringing members of the community together. However, such an initiative is unlikely to make money from an economic perspective. Considering economic and social issues may lead to situations that are ‘Equitable’. However, this might be to the detriment of environmental issues. For example, a company might build a factory in a town, providing jobs for local people and a boost to the local economy. However, this development might lead to the destruction of natural habitats or reduced air quality in the local area. Thinking sustainably requires therefore the holistic balance of all three pillars, with the need to incorporate the Environmental, Social and Economic in any decision that is made. Discover our sustainability consultancy services. Grace O'Connell Aug 27, 2024 Share: Related Articles April 2025 Blog Getting Started with Social Value: What It Is and Why It Matters Sam Walker April 2025 Blog Getting Started with Social Value: What It Is and Why It Matters In recent years, Social Value has emerged as a significant element within the framework of sustainable development, particularly in the context of public procurement. But whilst some organisations may be confident in their understanding and delivery of Social Value, many organisations – in particular SMEs – are being introduced to the concept for the first […] Keagan Allin April 2025 Modern Slavery & Human Rights The EU’s Omnibus Package: What’s Changing in CSRD and CSDDD Action Sustainability Staff April 2025 Modern Slavery & Human Rights The EU’s Omnibus Package: What’s Changing in CSRD and CSDDD In 2021 and 2022, the European Union introduced two groundbreaking sustainability laws: the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Now, more than three years later and with implementation just around the corner, the European Commission has put forward an ‘Omnibus Simplification Package’. This new proposal aims to ease […] Keagan Allin March 2025 COâ‚‚ Performance Ladder Comparing the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) with the CO2 Performance Ladder Action Sustainability Staff March 2025 COâ‚‚ Performance Ladder Comparing the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) with the CO2 Performance Ladder The Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and the CO2 Performance Ladder (the Ladder) are two powerful tools for organisations aiming to address climate change and reduce carbon emissions. While both share common goals, they differ in approach, scope, and application. This article provides a comprehensive comparison to help organisations understand their similarities, differences, and potential complementarities. […] Keagan Allin